Bon: Tibet's Fifth Tradition and Its Claim to Predate Buddhism
Bon is the Tibetan religion whose followers trace their teachings to Tonpa Shenrab rather than to the Buddha. Its claim to predate Buddhism in Tibet is more complicated than the popular version. This guide covers the three stages of Bon, the nine ways, the deities and scriptures that are Bon rather than Buddhist, the suppression it survived, and where it is practiced now.
What is Bon, and was it really Tibet's religion before Buddhism?
Bon is a Tibetan religion whose followers, called Bonpos, trace their teachings to a founder named Tonpa Shenrab rather than to the Buddha Shakyamuni, and the popular claim that Bon was simply Tibet's religion before Buddhism arrived is only half right. Two different things get confused under one word. There were pre-Buddhist ritual specialists in imperial Tibet, and Old Tibetan documents recovered from the sealed library cave at Dunhuang show priests called bon po and gshen performing funerals, oath rites and divination for the Yarlung kings in the seventh and eighth centuries. There is also Yungdrung Bon, an organized religion with monasteries, a canon, a nine-vehicle doctrinal system and a founder's biography, which becomes visible in the historical record around the eleventh century. Bonpos hold that the second is the survival of the first, driven underground by royal persecution and later recovered from hidden caches. Most academic historians, David Snellgrove, Per Kvaerne and Samten Karmay among them, hold that Yungdrung Bon took its present shape at the same time as the Tibetan Buddhist schools and in constant conversation with them. Neither side denies that Bon carries pre-Buddhist material. They disagree about how much of it, and about how unbroken the line is.
The word bon covers a verb, a class of priest and a religion, which is part of why the argument resists settlement. In the Old Tibetan sources bon appears to name a type of rite and the man who performs it, alongside gshen, a second class of ritualist whose name survives in Tonpa Shenrab's title and in the ordinary Bon word for a practitioner. Snellgrove's position, that Bon is best read as a heterodox form of Buddhism rather than a religion apart from it, annoyed Bonpos and satisfied few historians. It still caught the shape of the problem. Nearly every doctrinal category in Yungdrung Bon has a Buddhist twin, and the divergence sits in names, lineages and origin stories rather than in metaphysics. Henk Blezer and others have since traced how the founder's biography itself was assembled and expanded between the eleventh and fourteenth centuries. What does look genuinely archaic, on the evidence available, is ritual technology: rites for local gods, ransom offerings, dice divination, and an elaborate treatment of the dead that has no Indian model behind it.
Does bon mean the same thing in every Tibetan source?
No. In Old Tibetan documents bon names a rite or the priest who performs it, with no implication of an organized religion behind him. From the eleventh century onward Bonpo authors use the word for their whole tradition, roughly where a Buddhist writer would put chos. Tibetan writers also use bon loosely for village ritual with no Bonpo institutional connection at all, which is a steady source of confusion in English writing on Tibet.
Is Bon older than Buddhism?
Bon as a body of ritual practice is older than Buddhism in Tibet. Bon as an organized religion with texts, monasteries and a named founder is not demonstrably older, and the surviving documentation begins several centuries after Buddhism took root. The distinction matters because both claims get made with the same sentence. Bonpo tradition dates Tonpa Shenrab many thousands of years before Shakyamuni, which is a claim of religious rather than historical order.
What did the Yarlung kings' religion actually look like?
The Dunhuang manuscripts and the imperial pillar inscriptions show a religion built around the divine descent of the king. Oath ceremonies were sealed with animal sacrifice. The kings went into tombs in the Chongye valley, and long rites conducted the dead to a land of ancestors. Tibetan writers later sorted this material as mi chos, the religion of men, and distinguished it from lha chos, the religion of the gods.
Who was Tonpa Shenrab Miwoche, and what does Bon claim about its own origin?
Tonpa Shenrab Miwoche is the founder Bon claims for itself: an enlightened teacher born in the land of Olmo Lungring, in a country called Tazig somewhere west of Tibet, who is said to have taught the whole of Bon long before the Buddha Shakyamuni was born in India. His name breaks down usefully. Tonpa means teacher, shen rab means supreme shen or supreme priest, and mi bo che means great man. In the tradition's account he was a prince who married young, is said to have fathered eight sons and two daughters, renounced his inheritance at thirty-one and died at eighty-two, though Bon counts those as shen years rather than ordinary ones, which stretches the same basic arc across a span no chronology can hold. He came to Tibet, the story runs, chasing a demon who had stolen his horses, found the country unready for the higher teachings, and left behind only the ritual and divinatory portions of Bon, promising that the rest would follow later. Bonpos treat him as a fully enlightened buddha in the technical sense, not as a prophet or a culture hero, and they take refuge in him where a Tibetan Buddhist takes refuge in Shakyamuni. The dates given for him run to many thousands of years and are not offered as chronology in the modern sense.
Three texts carry the life story, and they grew in that order. The Dodu is the short version in a single volume. The Zermig is longer, in two. The Ziji, in twelve volumes, came to Loden Nyingpo, born in 1360, and Bon classifies it not as a text dug out of the ground but as an oral transmission dictated to him. It is the source David Snellgrove translated for his 1967 book The Nine Ways of Bon, working in London with the Bonpo scholars Tenzin Namdak and Samten Karmay, whom Rockefeller Foundation funding had brought to England in 1961. Historians reading the three side by side watch a biography being built out: episodes multiply, the geography of Olmo Lungring becomes more detailed, and the parallels with the Buddha's life sharpen with each version. Where Olmo Lungring was supposed to sit has generated a literature of its own. Tazig is often read as Tajik and by extension as Persia, which fed a mid-twentieth-century theory of Iranian origins. The description in the texts, with its central nine-tiered mountain and its four rivers running to the cardinal points, matches idealized sacred geography far more closely than any surveyable place.
What is Olmo Lungring?
Olmo Lungring is the country Bon texts name as Tonpa Shenrab's birthplace, said to occupy a third of the world, with a nine-tiered mountain at its center and four great rivers flowing out to the cardinal directions. The tradition holds it to be a real place that ordinary travelers can no longer reach. Its layout follows the widespread Indian model of a world mountain with radiating rivers, which is what makes literal identification so difficult.
How does Tonpa Shenrab's life differ from the Buddha's?
The two arcs sit closer together than the contrast is usually drawn. Tonpa Shenrab is said to have married, raised a large family and renounced his inheritance at thirty-one, where Shakyamuni left his household at twenty-nine and taught for forty-five years afterward. The differences lie elsewhere. Bon's founder spends much of his biography instituting rites, subduing demons and teaching ritual method, activity Buddhist accounts of Shakyamuni keep to the margins, and Bon reckons his eighty-two years on a scale that places him many thousands of years earlier.
Do Bonpos claim Tonpa Shenrab is historical?
Bonpos hold that Tonpa Shenrab was a real teacher, but the tradition's own dating places him roughly eighteen thousand years ago in some accounts, which puts the claim beyond anything historical method can test either way. Bon scholars in exile generally present the biography as sacred history rather than as chronicle. No evidence for a figure of that name survives outside the Bon corpus itself.
What do the three stages of Bon mean, and what is Yungdrung Bon?
The three stages are a scholarly device for separating three different things that Tibetan writers all call bon: the ritual practice of the imperial period, Yungdrung Bon, and New Bon. Scholarship since the 1970s has insisted on keeping the three apart, and the separation has held up better than any attempt to treat bon as a single thing. The first stage covers the funerary, divinatory and oath rites performed for the Yarlung kings before and during the introduction of Buddhism, known mainly from Dunhuang manuscripts rather than from Bon's own literature. The second stage, Yungdrung Bon, is the systematized religion that surfaces around the eleventh century with a canon, monastic ordination, a philosophical curriculum and a founder. It is what a person means today when they say they are Bonpo. The third stage, New Bon or Bon sarma, develops from roughly the fourteenth century in eastern Tibet, admits Padmasambhava alongside Tonpa Shenrab, and blends Bon with Nyingma material closely enough that several of its treasure-revealers are claimed by both traditions. Yungdrung means everlasting or indestructible. It is the Tibetan word for the swastika, and Bon uses it in most of the places where Tibetan Buddhism uses dorje, the vajra.
The hinge of the second stage is one event that every Bonpo historian records: in 1017 a figure named Shenchen Luga, whose dates are usually given as 996 to 1035, uncovered a large cache of Bon texts in Tsang. Whatever actually took place there, the revelation gave the tradition a scriptural base to build on. Shenchen Luga divided the recovered material among three disciples drawn from three different families, which is why Bon cosmology, Bon Dzogchen and Bon tantra descend through separate transmissions rather than one. The Dru family took the cosmological and metaphysical texts and founded the monastery of Yeru Wensakha in Tsang in 1072, the Zhu family took Dzogchen, and the Pa family took the tantric cycles. Terma, the recovery of concealed texts, matters as much to Bon as it does to the Nyingma school, and Bon's explanation for the concealment is the persecution under the eighth-century king Trisong Detsen. The three-stage scheme is a description imposed from outside. Bonpos do not experience their religion as three periods at all. They hold that one teaching was given by Tonpa Shenrab, hidden when conditions turned hostile, and returned when they improved.
What does the word yungdrung mean?
Yungdrung is the Tibetan word for the swastika, and it carries the sense of the unchanging. Bon uses it in almost every position where Tibetan Buddhism uses dorje, the vajra: the ritual scepter an officiant holds is a yungdrung, and where a Buddhist text speaks of adamantine reality a Bon text speaks of yungdrung reality. The word names the tradition itself. Bonpos stamp it on altar cloths and monastery walls too, always turning counterclockwise, which is the fastest way to tell a Bon building from a Buddhist one from across a valley.
What is New Bon and who accepts it?
New Bon, or Bon sarma, is a stream that grew from about the fourteenth century onward, mainly in Kham and Gyalrong in eastern Tibet, and it treats Padmasambhava as a Bon figure standing alongside Tonpa Shenrab. Conservative Yungdrung Bon institutions in central Tibet have long regarded it with reserve. Its treasure-revealers frequently worked across Bon and Nyingma lines at once, and a number of their revelations still circulate in both.
Where did Bon's hidden texts come from?
Bon terma are said to have been concealed during the persecutions, chiefly the eighth-century one under Trisong Detsen, and recovered from the eleventh century onward by qualified finders. Shenchen Luga's discovery of 1017 is the largest and the most consequential. Bon also recognizes mind treasures received directly in visionary experience rather than dug out of rock or wall. Read from outside the tradition, the mechanism is a way of authorizing new composition.
What does Bon actually teach across its nine ways?
Bon organizes its teachings into nine ways, a ladder running from divination and healing at the bottom to Dzogchen at the summit. Bon and the Nyingma school are the two Tibetan traditions that count nine vehicles, and their nine do not match each other. In the best-known version, the Southern Treasure system Snellgrove translated, the first four are called causal ways because they operate on cause and effect inside the world. The Way of the Shen of Prediction covers divination, astrology, ritual diagnosis and healing rites. The Way of the Shen of the Visual World, in Snellgrove's rendering, handles gods and spirits of the land and the negotiation between them and human beings. The Way of the Shen of Illusion supplies rites for repelling hostile forces. The Way of the Shen of Existence covers death: funerals, the guiding of consciousness, and the ransom of the dying. The remaining five are resultant ways aimed at liberation: the way of lay practitioners under vows, the way of monastic ascetics, the White A tantric way, the way of the primordial shen, and at the top the Unsurpassable Way, which is Dzogchen. Bon presents the nine as one graded curriculum, not as nine competing sects.
Bon has more than one ninefold scheme, which catches out readers who meet only Snellgrove's. The Southern Treasure system is the one just described. The Central Treasure and Northern Treasure systems cover the same ground with different divisions, the Central Treasure version sorting the ways along sutra, tantra and Dzogchen lines much as Tibetan Buddhism does. Bon classifies its scriptures by a second scheme entirely, the four portals and the treasury: White Waters for higher tantra, Black Waters for funerary and magical rites, the Land of Phan for monastic discipline and philosophy, the Guides for Dzogchen, and the Treasury for general material. The doctrinal content of the upper ways would be recognizable to any student of Tibetan Buddhism. What has no Buddhist counterpart as a formal vehicle is the lower four, and that is where Bon's distinctiveness concentrates. Snellgrove's 1967 translation ran through all nine in sequence, which is why English readers who know one book on Bon know the Southern Treasure scheme and not the other two.
Does Bon teach Dzogchen?
Bon teaches Dzogchen and places it at the top of its nine ways, exactly as the Nyingma school does. Little in the doctrine itself would surprise a Nyingma practitioner. Three cycles carry it: the Oral Transmission of Zhang Zhung, the A-tri system, and the Dzogchen Yangtse Longchen. Bonpos claim the first as an unbroken oral lineage, never concealed and never rediscovered, and they rate that continuity above any treasure-based line.
What are Bon's five elements?
Bon's five elements are earth, water, fire, air and space, the same set Indian Buddhism uses, arranged around a doctrine of how the elements emerge from an unconditioned base and go on to constitute both the outer world and the human body. They are not the Chinese five phases of wood, fire, earth, metal and water, which run on generating and controlling cycles. The Five Elements (Wu Xing): Cycles, Correspondences and Uses covers that separate system.
How much Bon doctrine is identical to Buddhist doctrine?
At the philosophical level, most of it. Yungdrung Bon teaches the four noble truths, dependent origination, the six perfections, emptiness and the bodhisattva ideal, under Bon terminology and with Bon lineages attached to each. A Bon monastic curriculum covers logic, epistemology and Madhyamaka in a sequence a Buddhist geshe would recognize. What differs is provenance, the ritual repertoire, and the four causal ways below the resultant ones.
Which deities, scriptures and lineages are distinctly Bon?
Bon has its own pantheon, its own two-part canon and its own transmission lineages, and a Tibetan Buddhist would recognize almost none of them as belonging to his tradition. At the head of the Bon pantheon stands a group usually given as four: Kuntu Zangpo, the all-good primordial buddha; Shenlha Okar, the god of white light, who is the deity of compassion and the source from which the teachings issue; Sangpo Bumtri, who brings the manifest world into being; and Tonpa Shenrab himself. Satrig Ersang, also called Sherab Chamma, the Loving Mother of Wisdom, is the great mother figure and occupies the place Tibetan Buddhists give to Prajnaparamita and Tara. The chief protector is Sipe Gyalmo, Queen of Existence, a wrathful female deity who rides a mule. Bon's meditational deities include Walse Ngampa, Meri and Trowo Tsochog Khagying, names absent from the Buddhist canon. The scriptures sit in a Bon Kanjur and a Bon Katen, structurally parallel to the Buddhist Kanjur and Tenjur but with almost entirely different contents. Per Kvaerne published a catalog of that canon in 1974, and Samten Karmay's 1972 translation of the Treasury of Good Sayings, a history of Bon written by the master Shardza Tashi Gyaltsen in 1922, remains the standard English window onto how the tradition narrates its own past.
The mantra a Bonpo recites daily is the Ma Tri, om ma tri mu ye sa le du, addressed to Shenlha Okar and used where a Tibetan Buddhist would use om mani padme hum. The syllable A, written in Tibetan script and usually visualized white, is the central Bon emblem of the natural state, which is why one Dzogchen cycle is called A-tri, the guidance of A. Lineage is where the separation runs deepest. A Bon teacher's authority traces back through Menri and through the Zhang Zhung masters to Tonpa Shenrab, and never through Nalanda, Atisha, Marpa or Padmasambhava. That is what makes Bon a fifth Tibetan tradition rather than a sixth Buddhist school, whatever the doctrinal overlap amounts to. The Zhang Zhung oral transmission preserves a list of masters, twenty-four in the standard count, each with a short life story attached, offered as evidence that the line was never once interrupted.
Who is Sipe Gyalmo?
Sipe Gyalmo, the Queen of Existence, is the principal protector deity of Bon, painted as a wrathful dark female figure with multiple arms and heads, riding a mule and ringed with flames. Bon monasteries perform her rites on a fixed calendar, and Menri holds her as its particular guardian. Tibetan Buddhism has no protector under that name, though her iconography obeys the same visual conventions as Palden Lhamo, whom she resembles closely enough that the two are regularly compared.
What is the Bonpo Kanjur?
The Bonpo Kanjur is the collection of scriptures Bon attributes to Tonpa Shenrab, running to well over a hundred volumes in the editions now in circulation, paired with a Katen of commentaries and treatises that is larger still. Complete sets were rare and hard to consult until reprints appeared in India and Nepal in the later twentieth century. Almost nothing in it overlaps with the Buddhist Kanjur.
Does Bon have reincarnate lamas?
Bon recognizes incarnate lamas on the same principle Tibetan Buddhism uses, and several Bon tulku lines have continued in exile. The abbot of Menri, who heads the whole tradition, is a partial exception: he is chosen by lot from among qualified geshes rather than identified as anyone's rebirth. Dawa Dhargyal Rinpoche was drawn that way as the thirty-fourth holder of the office after his predecessor died in 2017. Reincarnation: How Different Traditions Describe Rebirth sets out how the recognition system works across Tibetan schools.
How does Bon ritual practice differ from Tibetan Buddhist practice?
The visible differences in Bon ritual are direction, symbol, mantra and repertoire, and together they are consistent enough that a trained eye identifies a Bon temple within seconds of walking in. Bonpos circumambulate and turn prayer wheels counterclockwise where Tibetan Buddhists go clockwise, and the swastika on a Bon altar faces left where the Buddhist one faces right. The mantra chanted is the Ma Tri rather than om mani padme hum, and the ritual scepter in the officiant's hand is a yungdrung rather than a dorje. Past those markers, Bon carries a far larger body of pragmatic ritual than any Buddhist school retained as formal doctrine: rites for earth lords disturbed by digging or building, ransom ceremonies that substitute a dough effigy for a sick person, thread-cross constructions built to catch a harmful influence, divination by dice and by knotted cord, and a long graded sequence of funeral observances. The sang, a juniper smoke offering burned at dawn on a rooftop or a pass, belongs to this layer, and so does the raising of wind horse flags to restore a person's fortune. Bon monastic liturgy, robes and daily discipline otherwise look much like their Buddhist equivalents.
The four causal ways are the reason the ritual repertoire is so large. Bon never demoted the technology for dealing with lha, nyen and lu, the classes of being that occupy the sky, the middle world and the water and soil, and it kept that work inside its own doctrinal hierarchy instead of parking it at the edges of religion as folk custom. Tibetan Buddhism absorbed a great deal of the same material during its first centuries in Tibet, so a Nyingma or Sakya monastery also performs earth-lord rites and builds thread-crosses; the difference is that Bon gives those practices a formal vehicle and a scriptural home rather than an informal one. Bon also has its own tantric cycles with their own deities, mandalas and initiations, so a Bon practitioner can enter a tantric path without touching a Buddhist lineage at any point. Its parallel to the intermediate-state teachings runs through the Bon Zhi Khro cycle of peaceful and wrathful deities.
What is the Ma Tri mantra?
The Ma Tri is Bon's most widely recited mantra, om ma tri mu ye sa le du, addressed to Shenlha Okar. Bon teachers explain it as purifying rebirth in each of the six realms, which is the same logic Tibetan Buddhists apply to om mani padme hum. Lay Bonpos learn it first, count it on a mala of one hundred and eight beads, and carve it on prayer walls across Bon districts in Dolpo and Gyalrong.
What is a sang offering in Bon?
A sang offering is a smoke offering of juniper and other aromatic plants, burned at dawn in a hearth on a roof, a hilltop or a mountain pass. It goes to local gods, earth lords and water spirits, as courtesy and as apology for the disturbance ordinary living causes them. Digging a foundation offends them. In Bon the rite belongs to the causal ways and has its own liturgical texts and officiants rather than sitting outside religion as household custom.
Do Bon monks look different from Buddhist monks?
Bon monastic robes are maroon and closely resemble Tibetan Buddhist ones, and the vows, the shaved head and the daily schedule are near enough that clothing rarely settles the question for a visitor. The ritual objects are the reliable tell. Look for a yungdrung in the hand where a dorje would be, a left-facing swastika on the altar cloth, and the Ma Tri rather than om mani padme hum in the chanting.
How did Bon survive suppression, and what happened to its monasteries?
Bon survived by moving east, by building a monastic system that could reproduce itself, and in the twentieth century by rebuilding that system in exile. The tradition's own history records two persecutions. The first is legendary, under the early king Drigum Tsenpo. The second is documented: Trisong Detsen made Buddhism the state religion in the eighth century, and Bon texts were, in Bon's account, hidden rather than burned. From the seventeenth century the Ganden Podrang government headed by the Dalai Lamas directed patronage to the Buddhist schools, and Bon institutions were left outside it, at times pressured to convert. The center of Bon gravity shifted to Kham, Amdo and Gyalrong in the east, and to the Himalayan borderlands of Nepal, where distance from Lhasa was its own protection. Menri monastery, founded in Tsang in 1405 by Nyammey Sherab Gyaltsen, became the head institution and the model for a Bon monastic curriculum ending in a geshe degree. The Cultural Revolution then destroyed Menri along with most Tibetan religious institutions of every school, and by the late 1960s the tradition's continuity ran through a very small number of refugees.
Nyammey Sherab Gyaltsen, who lived from 1356 to 1415, did more for Bon's survival than any other single figure, because Menri gave the tradition a scholastic system with a curriculum, examinations and a degree at the end. Yungdrung Ling, founded in 1834, became the second great central Tibetan Bon monastery. The nonsectarian movement in nineteenth-century Kham, associated with Jamgon Kongtrul and his circle, treated Bon material as worth collecting rather than suppressing, and the Bon master Shardza Tashi Gyaltsen, who died in 1934, wrote the histories and Dzogchen manuals from which most Bon teaching in the West is still drawn. The rebuilding after 1959 was the work of a handful of men. Bonpo refugees obtained land at Dolanji in Himachal Pradesh, India, and building on the new Menri began there in 1967. Sangye Tenzin Jongdong was drawn as the thirty-third Menri Trizin in 1968 and enthroned in March 1969, taking the name Lungtok Tenpai Nyima and leading the tradition until his death in 2017. Yongdzin Tenzin Namdak, born in 1926, carried the Dzogchen transmission out of Tibet and later founded Triten Norbutse monastery in Kathmandu.
Was Bon actually persecuted by Trisong Detsen?
Partly. Tibetan sources on both sides agree that Trisong Detsen made Buddhism the state religion in the eighth century and that Bon lost royal support at that point. The detailed persecution narrative, with texts buried in cliffs and priests driven into exile, comes from Bon histories written centuries afterward. Historians accept the loss of patronage as fact. They read the burial account as a story composed to explain where the treasure texts came from.
What is Menri monastery?
Menri, meaning medicine mountain, is the head monastery of Yungdrung Bon, founded in Tsang in 1405 and reestablished at Dolanji in northern India in 1967 after the original was destroyed. Its abbot, the Menri Trizin, holds the senior office in Bon. The Indian Menri runs a full geshe curriculum, a school for children, a nunnery nearby, and the printing of Bon texts.
How many Bon monasteries survive in Tibet today?
Bon sources counted a little over three hundred monasteries across Tibet at the start of the twentieth century, and several hundred monasteries and temples are described as active today inside the Tibet Autonomous Region and the Tibetan areas of Sichuan, Qinghai and Gansu, with the heaviest concentration in Gyalrong and Ngawa in western Sichuan and around Nagchu in the north. No independent census exists. Published figures come either from the institutions themselves or from Chinese state surveys, and both should be treated as approximate rather than counted on.
Where is Bon practiced today, and can an outsider study it?
Bon is practiced today in eastern and northern Tibet, in Himalayan Nepal, in exile communities in India, and in a small but organized network of Western centers, and an outsider can study most of it openly. Inside Tibet the strongest areas are Gyalrong and Ngawa in western Sichuan, parts of Amdo, and Nagchu in the north, with scattered communities further west. In Nepal, Bon villages persist in Dolpo and Mustang, including the old Bon settlement at Lubra, and Triten Norbutse monastery in Kathmandu trains monks drawn from all of them. In India, Menri at Dolanji is the administrative and scholastic center of the exile tradition. In the West, Ligmincha International, founded by Tenzin Wangyal Rinpoche in 1992, teaches Bon dream yoga, sleep yoga and Dzogchen to lay students, and European centers connected to Yongdzin Tenzin Namdak have taught since the 1990s. Bon has not restricted its basic teaching to Tibetans, and its senior teachers have generally been willing to explain the tradition to scholars and foreign students. Higher tantric practice requires initiation, as it does in every Tibetan lineage.
Bon's public position improved sharply in exile. In 1977 a Bon representative took a seat in the exile parliament alongside the four Buddhist schools, and the fourteenth Dalai Lama recognized Bon as a religious tradition of Tibet in its own right. He visited Menri at Dolanji in 1987 and left a letter restating that position, and The 14th Dalai Lama: Core Teachings, Key Ideas and Practices covers his teaching and his role. That recognition closed centuries in which Bonpos in central Tibet were treated as heterodox at best. Mount Kailash in the far west, at the heart of the old Zhang Zhung country, is Bon's holiest mountain, and Mount Kailash: History, Alignments and Spiritual Significance sets out what the four traditions that revere it actually do there. For a reader in English, the practical entry points are the published translations, Snellgrove and Karmay for the texts and Kvaerne for the iconography, together with the teaching programs run out of Kathmandu, Dolanji and Europe, which have long been open to foreign students.
Can a non-Tibetan become a Bon practitioner?
Yes. Bon sets no ethnic or hereditary bar to lay practice, and Western students take refuge, receive the Ma Tri and study Dzogchen at centers in Europe, North America and Nepal. A small number of Westerners have taken Bon monastic ordination. Advanced tantric cycles are given by initiation and at a teacher's discretion, which is the ordinary rule across every Tibetan tradition rather than a restriction aimed at outsiders.
What is the best-known Bon teaching in the West?
Dream yoga and sleep yoga are the Bon teachings with the widest Western following, mostly through Tenzin Wangyal Rinpoche's book The Tibetan Yogas of Dream and Sleep, published in 1998. Bon Dzogchen instruction and the trul khor movement exercises also draw students. Many people meet these practices without ever learning that they are Bon rather than Buddhist, since the presentation seldom dwells on the difference.
Is the Zhang Zhung language still spoken?
No. Zhang Zhung is extinct as a spoken language and is known from bilingual passages in Bon texts, from short glossaries, and from names embedded in Tibetan sources. Linguists place it in the Tibeto-Burman family, close to the West Himalayish group that includes languages still spoken in Kinnaur and Lahaul. Bon liturgies preserve Zhang Zhung phrases that are recited today rather than understood.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Bon a form of Buddhism or a separate religion?
Bon is a separate Tibetan religion that shares most of its doctrine and much of its institutional structure with Tibetan Buddhism. Bonpos take refuge in Tonpa Shenrab rather than Shakyamuni, use their own canon, and trace lineages that never pass through India. David Snellgrove read Bon as a heterodox form of Buddhism rather than a religion apart from it, a reading that captures the doctrinal overlap and irritates Bonpos for understandable reasons. The Tibetan exile administration counts Bon as the fifth Tibetan tradition, not as a Buddhist school.
How many Bon practitioners are there today?
No reliable count exists. Published estimates run from roughly 160,000 to about 400,000 people, or somewhere between one and four percent of the Tibetan population, but none of them rests on a census that ever asked the question, and religious identification inside the People's Republic of China is not surveyed in a way that would settle it. The exile community is small, numbering in the thousands, and concentrated at Dolanji in India and in Kathmandu. Treat any precise number you encounter with suspicion.
Does the Dalai Lama recognize Bon as a Tibetan school?
Yes. The change dates to 1977, when a Bon representative was first seated in the exile parliament and the fourteenth Dalai Lama recognized Bon as a religious tradition of Tibet standing beside the Nyingma, Kagyu, Sakya and Gelug schools. He visited Menri at Dolanji in 1987 and left a letter describing Bon as an indigenous religion of Tibet, and he came back in 2007. He has spoken of the tradition as carrying elements of Tibetan culture older than Buddhism. The recognition broke with centuries of central Tibetan practice, in which Bon institutions received no state patronage and were often treated as suspect.
Is Bon the same thing as Tibetan shamanism?
No. Bon is a monastic religion with a canon, ordination, a philosophical curriculum and a Dzogchen tradition, and equating it with shamanism describes only the four causal ways at the bottom of its own hierarchy. Tibet does have ritual specialists who work through possession and trance, including oracle mediums and village practitioners, and some of them are called bonpo locally. They are not the ordained Bonpos of Menri and Triten Norbutse, and the two categories should be kept apart.
Why is the Bon swastika drawn facing left?
The Bon yungdrung turns counterclockwise, the mirror image of the Buddhist swastika. Bonpos treat that orientation as original to their own tradition rather than as a reversal of anyone else's. The same left-turning direction governs how a Bonpo walks around a temple or a sacred mountain and which way a prayer wheel is spun. Walk the wrong way around Kailash and a Bonpo pilgrim will put you right. The shape itself is old in both India and Tibet. Its twentieth-century European use came out of nineteenth-century German philology about a supposed Aryan past, and has no bearing on what a yungdrung means on a Bon altar.
Did Bon come from Persia or Central Asia?
Bon's own texts place Tonpa Shenrab's homeland in Tazig, a name often read as Tajik and by extension as Iran, and Helmut Hoffmann argued in the mid twentieth century for genuine Iranian and Manichaean influence on Bon. Later specialists have found the evidence for direct Manichaean influence thin, and where Tazig might have sat is still argued over, with proposals running from Persia to the Gilgit and Bactria borderlands of what is now northern Pakistan and Afghanistan. The Bon material that can actually be traced runs to India and to Tibet's own imperial ritual, and Olmo Lungring reads as sacred geography rather than a mappable country.
Is Tibetan Bon related to Japan's Obon festival?
No, the two are unrelated, and the resemblance is an accident of romanization. Japan's Obon is a Buddhist summer observance for the ancestral dead, its name shortened from urabon-e, which renders the term ullambana and reached Japan through Chinese Buddhist texts. Tibetan Bon is a Tibetan word for a religion and for a class of priest, written with different letters and pronounced with a different vowel. Spoken Tibetan pronounces the word closer to pon, with a front rounded vowel Japanese does not have.
Try Our Free Tools
Related topics: bon religion, bon tibet, bonpo, tibetan bon tradition, bon buddhism difference, yungdrung bon, tonpa shenrab
