Akashic Records: What They Are and How People Claim to Access Them
The Akashic records are described in esoteric teaching as a universal archive holding every soul's thoughts, choices, and experiences across all its lifetimes. The concept entered Western vocabulary through the Theosophical Society in the late 1800s and reached a mass American audience through Edgar Cayce's trance readings. This guide covers the origins, the access methods practitioners describe, what a reading involves, and the criticisms worth taking seriously.
What are the Akashic records?
The Akashic records are described in esoteric teaching as a universal archive holding every thought, choice, word, and event belonging to every soul across all of its lifetimes. The name comes from the Sanskrit akasha, usually translated as ether or space, which esoteric writers treat as the subtle medium impressions are stored in. The records are not a library in any literal sense, though nearly everyone who describes them reaches for library imagery. Practitioners speak of halls, shelves, scrolls, and a bound volume with their own name on the spine. What the Akashic records are said to contain runs wider than biography. Alongside events they are described as holding the intent behind those events, the agreements a soul made before incarnating, the patterns it repeats across lives, and the potentials still open to it. That last item carries weight: the Akashic records are presented not as a fixed transcript of a fixed fate but as a living document that updates as choices change.
The Akashic records concept solves a specific problem for the traditions that use it. If a soul carries learning between lifetimes, something has to carry that learning, and personality and memory demonstrably do not survive intact. An archive external to any single incarnation gives reincarnation a mechanism, and that is the job the Akashic records were built to do. This explains why the records are described as both intensely personal and completely universal, and why access is framed as permission rather than location. Nobody travels anywhere to reach the Akashic records in modern teaching; the records are treated as already present, with attention and consent as the only variables. Readers arriving from out-of-body traditions expect a journey, and the guide What Is the Astral Plane? Theosophical Maps, Kabbalah, and Buddhist Bardos covers those layered cosmologies. Akashic work almost never uses them.
What does the akashic records meaning refer to in everyday terms?
In everyday terms the akashic records meaning is closest to a soul-level memory a person can consult about their own life. Practitioners use it to ask why a pattern keeps returning, what a difficult relationship is teaching, or what someone came into this life intending to do. Stripped of cosmology, the working definition most readers operate with is a structured way of asking deep questions about yourself and treating whatever surfaces as information worth writing down rather than dismissing.
Do the Akashic records contain other people's information?
Most Akashic records teachers hold that a reader accesses only their own record unless another person explicitly consents to theirs being read. The standard rule allows questions about your relationship with someone, since that relationship sits inside your own record, but forbids asking what that person is thinking or planning. Practitioners frame this as a consent boundary rather than a technical limit, and a reader who offers to look up an absent third party is departing from the ethics their own tradition sets out.
Where did the idea of the Akashic records come from?
The Akashic records entered Western esoteric vocabulary through the Theosophical Society, founded in New York in 1875 by Helena Blavatsky, Henry Steel Olcott, and William Quan Judge. Blavatsky's two major works, Isis Unveiled and The Secret Doctrine, drew heavily on Sanskrit terminology and set akasha alongside an older European occult idea, the astral light, which the French occultist Eliphas Levi had described as a universal fluid retaining the imprint of everything that happens in it. Blavatsky herself wrote more often of astral light than of anything called records. The compound phrase was popularized by the generation that followed her. Charles Webster Leadbeater wrote at length on reading past events clairvoyantly, treating the capacity as a trainable form of vision. Rudolf Steiner, who led the German section of the Theosophical Society before founding Anthroposophy, published essays in the early twentieth century presenting prehistoric material he said he had read from what he called the Akasha Chronicle.
Reading the theosophy akashic material in its own period explains a great deal about its shape. The Theosophical Society formed when European scholars were translating Sanskrit texts in volume, when spiritualism had made contact with the dead a drawing-room activity, and when physicists were seriously proposing a luminiferous ether filling all space. Theosophy fused all of it: a universal medium physics appeared to endorse, a Sanskrit name carrying the authority of ancient scripture, and a spiritualist expectation that trained sensitives perceive what ordinary people cannot. The ether hypothesis was later discarded by physics, but the esoteric structure built on top of it kept running. Blavatsky and her successors took technical vocabulary from living Hindu and Buddhist traditions, recombined it into a system those traditions do not teach, and presented the result as the hidden core of all religions. The Secret Doctrine also contains a doctrine of successive root races that has been criticized at length for encoding a racial hierarchy.
Did Blavatsky invent the term Akashic records?
Helena Blavatsky supplied the ingredients rather than the finished phrase. Her writing joined the Sanskrit akasha to the European occult concept of astral light as a recording medium, and that fusion is the direct ancestor of the Akashic records. The specific compound term became standard through later Theosophical writers, particularly Charles Webster Leadbeater and Rudolf Steiner, and through the popular occult press of the early twentieth century. Attributing the exact phrase to Blavatsky is common online and is not accurate.
What did Rudolf Steiner claim to read in the Akasha Chronicle?
Rudolf Steiner claimed to read prehistory. His Akasha Chronicle essays present accounts of Atlantis and Lemuria and of the development of human consciousness across vast epochs, offered as direct perception rather than argument, which is precisely why the material sits outside anything a historian can assess. It is also the least tested part of a body of work whose practical outgrowths, Waldorf education and biodynamic agriculture, are the reason Steiner's name still circulates.
How did Edgar Cayce popularize Akashic records readings in America?
Edgar Cayce brought the Akashic records to a mass American audience by giving thousands of readings in a self-induced trance, during which he described consulting a universal record he called both the Akashic records and the Book of Life. Cayce, a Kentuckian with a conventional Christian upbringing and no esoteric training, would lie down, enter an altered state, and answer questions posed by a conductor while a stenographer transcribed. He died in 1945, and the organization he founded, the Association for Research and Enlightenment in Virginia Beach, has preserved and indexed the transcripts ever since. What made the edgar cayce akashic records material spread was its subject matter. His early readings were overwhelmingly medical, prescribing treatments for people who wrote to him with illnesses, and the striking cases in that body of work built his reputation. Later readings turned to past lives, soul purpose, and the structure of the records themselves.
Edgar Cayce matters to the history of the Akashic records for a reason separate from whether his readings were accurate. He translated a Theosophical concept into Protestant American language, and that translation is why the idea took root outside occult subculture. Where Blavatsky offered Sanskrit and a hierarchy of hidden masters, Cayce offered a Book of Life and answers phrased in the cadence of scripture. The evidential picture is genuinely mixed and worth stating without spin. The transcripts are real, they were recorded as the readings were given, and their volume is unusual. What is missing is controlled testing. The readings that circulate are the memorable ones, selected after the fact by an organization with an interest in his reputation, and the rate of misses across the full archive has never been independently assessed. His medical readings occupy especially uncomfortable ground: prescribing treatment for people he never examined is exactly the practice modern Akashic teachers tell their students to refuse.
What did Edgar Cayce say the Akashic records actually were?
Edgar Cayce described the Akashic records as a record of every impulse, thought, and deed made by every soul since the beginning, written on what he called the skein of time and space. In his readings the record was something read aloud to him by a presence he never named precisely, and he consistently used the imagery of a large book whose pages were turned for him. He also insisted the record existed for understanding rather than prediction, which lines up closely with what current practitioners teach.
Are Edgar Cayce's readings available to read?
Edgar Cayce's readings were transcribed as they were given and have been preserved and indexed by the Association for Research and Enlightenment in Virginia Beach. Substantial portions have been published in book form and through the organization's own channels. Anyone assessing the material should work from the archive rather than the anthologies, since published collections are curated toward the impressive cases and give no sense of how often the readings were wrong.
How to access the Akashic records: what methods do practitioners use?
Practitioners describe four broad approaches to how to access akashic records, and nearly every course teaches some combination of them. The first is a spoken opening, a fixed prayer read aloud that is treated as the doorway, and this dominates contemporary Western teaching. The second is guided visualization, in which the reader walks a described path, up a staircase, along a corridor, through a door, into a hall where a keeper meets them. The third is trance induction, the Cayce approach, in which the reader enters a deep altered state and speaks while someone else asks questions and writes the answers down. The fourth is what teachers call an open channel, where an experienced practitioner drops in without ceremony after years of using one. Across all four the sequence is identical: settle the body, state an intention, open, ask, receive, record, close. The closing is not decorative, and a session left open is treated as sloppy work in the way an unclosed circle is in ritual practice.
The details separating a productive session from a frustrating one are almost entirely practical. Ask out loud rather than silently, because speech commits you to one question and stops you drifting between five. Write continuously without editing, because the impulse to assess what just arrived is what shuts the flow down. Set a timer, since long sessions produce material of steadily declining quality and readers reliably fail to notice this in the moment. Practitioners consistently report that their earliest sessions produced material they dismissed as imagination and only recognized as useful on rereading the notes weeks later. That gap is why journaling is non-negotiable in every serious lineage. The state itself is relaxed and alert rather than deep, closer to the receptive quiet described in Eckhart Tolle: The Power of Now & Living in Presence than to hypnosis, and readers who strain for an exotic altered state make the practice harder for themselves.
How to access akashic records for the first time without a teacher?
A workable first session needs a quiet room, thirty uninterrupted minutes, a notebook, and one written question about your own life. Sit upright, breathe slowly until the body settles, read your chosen opening aloud, then ask the question aloud and write whatever arrives without stopping to judge it. When the flow thins out, thank whatever you addressed, state clearly that you are closing, and put the notebook away unread. Return to those notes a week later, when you are no longer invested in whether the session worked.
Do you need to be in a trance to read the Akashic records?
Trance is not required for Akashic records work in contemporary practice, and most current teachers actively discourage aiming for it. The Cayce model, where the reader loses awareness entirely and someone else records the answers, needs a second person and produces material the reader cannot check against their own memory. The prevailing modern approach keeps the reader awake, aware, and writing, which makes the practice self-sufficient. Deep trance is treated as a different discipline rather than a superior one.
What is an Akashic record prayer and why do practitioners use one?
An akashic record prayer is a fixed spoken formula used to open and close a session, functioning as both a permission request and a state trigger. The best known example in contemporary practice is the Pathway Prayer developed by the American teacher Linda Howe and published in her work on reading the records, which addresses a group she names as the Lords of the Records along with the reader's own Masters, Teachers, and Loved Ones. Howe's prayer is copyrighted and taught within her lineage, and other teachers such as Ernesto Ortiz have published their own openings with a similar structure. The architecture common to all of them has four parts: an address to whatever is being asked, a request for permission and protection, a statement naming the reader by their legal name so the correct record is identified, and a declaration that the record is now open. The closing prayer reverses the sequence and states plainly that the record is closed.
The reason an akashic record prayer is repeated verbatim is straightforward and does not depend on the cosmology being true. A fixed phrase said in the same posture, in the same place, at the same point in a routine becomes a conditioned cue, and the body learns to drop into a particular state on hearing it, the same mechanism athletes use in a pre-performance ritual. This is also why teachers warn against skipping the closing: an opening never paired with a close loses its power as a signal, and the practice starts to feel diffuse. Legal name usage matters more than it looks. Most lineages instruct the reader to use the name on their birth certificate or current legal documents rather than a chosen or spiritual name, reasoning that the record is indexed to the identity someone actually lives under. Teachers working with people who have changed their name have largely moved to using the name the person genuinely holds as their own.
Can you write your own Akashic records prayer?
Writing your own opening is accepted in most lineages outside those teaching a specific copyrighted prayer, and the requirement is structural rather than poetic. Include an address to whatever you are asking, an explicit request for permission, your own name so the record being opened is identified, and a clear statement that the record is open. Write the closing at the same time, keep both short enough to say from memory, then stop changing them. A prayer rewritten every month never becomes the conditioned cue it needs to be.
What does closing the Akashic records involve?
Closing the Akashic records involves a spoken formula mirroring the opening, thanking whatever was addressed and stating explicitly that the record is now closed, usually repeated two or three times as the lineage prescribes. Practitioners describe the closing as the point where attention returns fully to ordinary awareness, and teachers treat forgetting it as the most common beginner error. The practical effect is a clean boundary: the session ends, the notebook shuts, and the material stops bleeding into the rest of the day.
What happens during an Akashic records reading?
An akashic records reading with a professional practitioner follows a predictable shape. The reader asks for your legal name and date of birth, explains what they will and will not answer, and asks you to prepare questions in advance. They then read their opening prayer aloud, often with your name spoken into it, and describe a shift in their own state. From there the session is a conversation: you ask, the reader speaks what comes, and you follow up. The material tends to be thematic rather than factual. Clients report hearing about recurring patterns, about the emotional logic behind a stuck situation, about why a relationship carries more charge than its history explains, and about what a soul is described as having intended for this lifetime. Past-life content appears in many readings, usually as imagery rather than verifiable biography.
Judging the quality of an Akashic records reading is easier if you know what a good one refuses to do. A strong reader declines medical questions and says why, will not report what an absent person is thinking, will not name dates for future events, and notices out loud when they are unsure. A weaker reader produces a smooth continuous stream that fits anyone, escalates urgency, and mentions blocks or attachments that further sessions could clear. Preparation changes the outcome more than clients expect: bring four or five written questions phrased around your own experience, and resist volunteering background before the reader speaks, since the less you supply the more informative the session becomes. Reviewing the recording a month later, once the atmosphere of the session has worn off, is the only reliable way to judge whether a reading told you something or reflected you back at yourself.
What does an Akashic records reading feel like from the client's side?
Clients typically describe an Akashic records reading as feeling like an unusually direct conversation rather than anything mystical. The reader speaks in a different cadence, often slower and more halting than their normal speech, and pauses to receive rather than to think. Many clients report an emotional response arriving before they consciously agree with what was said, and readers treat that reaction as a signal worth following. Physical sensations are rarely reported, and people expecting atmosphere are often surprised how plain the experience is.
Should you record your Akashic records reading?
Recording an Akashic records reading is strongly worth doing, and a practitioner who refuses without a clear reason is worth questioning. Sessions move quickly, emotionally charged material is poorly remembered, and a recording lets you check months later whether what you remember matches what was said. That check cuts both ways: it protects you from over-crediting a vague statement your memory sharpened, and it lets you notice when something specific and unexpected turned out to be accurate.
What kinds of questions work in the Akashic records and which do not?
Questions that work in the Akashic records are open, self-directed, and aimed at pattern rather than fact. Practitioners consistently report that questions beginning with what, why, and how produce usable material, while questions answerable with yes or no produce either silence or whatever the reader already believed. Asking what sits underneath a recurring conflict at work gives the practice something to do; asking whether you will get the promotion does not. Four categories are treated as poor fits regardless of phrasing. Medical questions are refused by every responsible practitioner. Questions about what another living person thinks or intends fall outside the consent boundary the tradition sets. Questions demanding dates sit against the framework's own claim that the records show potentials rather than outcomes. Financial and legal decisions requiring professional expertise belong with professionals. What remains is a large territory: purpose, meaning, pattern, and the emotional architecture of a stuck situation.
The phrasing of an Akashic records question does more work than beginners expect, and the fix is usually to move the subject of the sentence back onto yourself. Why does my partner keep withdrawing is a question about someone who has not consented; what in me is activated when my partner withdraws is the same situation asked legitimately, and readers report it produces far more material. Once the question is about your own experience of a thing rather than about the thing, it sits inside your own record. The standard follow-up technique is to take whatever came and ask it to go further, using phrases like tell me more about that, or what am I not seeing here. Practitioners describe the first answer as almost always the surface layer and the third or fourth follow-up as where the useful material lives. Readers coming from oracle work will recognize the pattern from How to Read Oracle Cards: Shuffling, Pulling, Spreads & Intuitive Interpretation.
Can you ask the Akashic records about a past life?
Past-life questions are among the most commonly asked in Akashic records work, and practitioners answer them freely while framing the results carefully. What tends to arrive is imagery, emotional tone, and a sense of relationship rather than names, dates, or checkable historical detail. Teachers generally instruct students to treat past-life material as a way of understanding a current pattern rather than as history, and to notice that the useful part of such a session is almost always what it says about the present situation that prompted the question.
What is the single best question to ask the Akashic records?
The question most widely recommended across Akashic records lineages is what do I most need to know right now. It works because it imposes no assumption about the answer, requires no framing, and cannot be steered by what the asker hopes to hear. Teachers suggest opening every session with it before moving to specific questions, reasoning that whatever surfaces unprompted is more informative than the agenda you arrived with. A close second asks what a difficult situation is trying to teach.
What are the honest criticisms of Akashic records readings?
The strongest criticism of Akashic records readings is that everything they produce can be explained by cold reading, confirmation bias, and the reader's own subconscious material, and no test has ever distinguished a genuine reading from a skilled imitation. Cold reading is the well-documented technique of generating statements broad enough to fit most people while appearing specific, then narrowing based on the client's reactions. It works whether or not the reader intends it, which is the part that matters: a sincere practitioner and a deliberate fraud produce indistinguishable transcripts. Confirmation bias handles the rest, since clients remember the hits and forget the misses, and a recording almost nobody reviews is the only thing that would catch it. Cryptomnesia explains a large share of past-life content, where material absorbed from a book or film years earlier resurfaces with no sense of its origin. Add the financial architecture on top: certification is an unregulated market where courses cost more than readings and the incentive runs toward telling students they have a gift.
Two further criticisms of Akashic records work deserve to be taken seriously, and they cut in different directions. The first concerns harm from medical and psychiatric substitution. Cayce's legacy included readings that diagnosed and prescribed, and although modern teachers refuse medical questions almost universally, some practitioners still describe illness as karmic or held in the record. A person told their condition originates in a past life may delay treatment, and that cost falls hardest on the people least able to absorb it. The second concerns the source material. Theosophy assembled the Akashic records by taking Sanskrit vocabulary from living traditions and building something those traditions do not teach, then presenting it as their hidden essence. The defensible response is not to abandon the practice but to be accurate about what it is: a Western esoteric system of the late 1800s that borrowed a Sanskrit name, rather than an ancient Vedic teaching.
Is there any scientific evidence for the Akashic records?
There is no scientific evidence for the Akashic records. No controlled study has shown that readings produce information the reader could not have inferred, and the concept makes no prediction that could be tested and fail, which places it outside science rather than in conflict with it. Some writers invoke quantum mechanics or the zero-point field to give the idea a physical footing; those arguments are not accepted physics and use technical terms outside their meaning. The practice can be described honestly without borrowing scientific authority it does not have.
How can you tell if an Akashic records practitioner is trustworthy?
A trustworthy Akashic records practitioner declines medical, legal, and financial questions and explains why, refuses to read a third party who has not consented, avoids naming dates, says openly when nothing is coming through, and never suggests you have a curse, block, or attachment that further paid sessions would clear. They give you the recording, quote one price up front, and do not create urgency. Anyone whose reading concludes that you need a package of sessions is describing their business model rather than your record.
How do the Akashic records compare to other ideas about universal memory?
The Akashic records belong to a family of ideas about a record that outlasts the individual, and setting them beside the others clarifies what is distinctive about them. Jewish and Christian scripture describes a Book of Life, a ledger of names and deeds opened at judgment. Islamic tradition describes al-Lawh al-Mahfuz, the Preserved Tablet, along with recording angels who write each person's deeds. Buddhist Yogacara philosophy analyzes alaya-vijnana, a storehouse consciousness holding the seeds of past action that ripen into future experience. Carl Jung proposed a collective unconscious populated by inherited archetypes, a shared inheritance rather than an archive of events. The biologist Rupert Sheldrake proposed morphic resonance, a hypothesis that habits of form accumulate across a species, which mainstream biology rejects. What separates the Akashic records from all of these is purpose and access. Scriptural records are read by God at an accounting; the Akashic records are described as consultable by the soul itself, during life, for the sake of changing the pattern they document.
One comparison deserves particular care because it is made so often and so loosely. Writers sometimes present the Akashic records as a scientific hypothesis by attaching them to the quantum vacuum or the zero-point field, and at least one popular book has built an entire framework around an Akashic field. Those arguments borrow the vocabulary of physics without its constraints, and no working physicist treats them as physics. Non-dual traditions offer a more interesting comparison, and a genuinely tense one. If awareness is singular and undivided, as the teachers surveyed in Rupert Spira: The Nature of Consciousness and Non-Duality argue, then an archive of individual soul histories describes appearance rather than what is ultimately the case. Some Akashic teachers accept this and treat the records as a useful structure within relative experience. Others hold that individual soul records persist. The disagreement is real, unresolved, and rarely acknowledged in beginner material.
Are the Akashic records the same as the collective unconscious?
The Akashic records and Jung's collective unconscious are different claims that get conflated because both propose something shared beneath individual minds. Jung described inherited structural patterns, the archetypes, that shape how any psyche organizes experience; he did not propose a stored record of specific events belonging to specific people. The Akashic records are exactly that kind of event-level archive, indexed by individual soul. Jung's concept is a psychological hypothesis about form, while the Akashic records are an esoteric claim about content.
How do the Akashic records relate to karma?
In Akashic teaching the records document karma rather than enforce it. The record is described as holding the pattern of past choices and the consequences still working themselves out, while karma names the mechanism by which those consequences arrive. This is why practitioners frame a reading as an opportunity rather than a verdict: seeing a pattern written down is treated as the point at which interrupting it becomes possible. Note that this uses karma in its Western esoteric sense, which is narrower and more personal than the concept in Hindu and Buddhist philosophy.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can anyone access the Akashic records, or do you need to be psychic?
Most modern Akashic records teachers hold that access is a learnable skill rather than a rare gift, and they build their courses on that claim. The usual position is that a prayer or opening sequence does the work natural clairvoyance does for a few people, which is why emphasis falls on the wording of the opening. Older Theosophical writers disagreed sharply, treating the capacity as advanced clairvoyance earned over years and available to almost nobody. The teaching community's shift from a rare-gift model to a teachable-skill model tracks the growth of paid certification programs as much as anything else.
How much does an Akashic records reading cost?
Akashic records readings are priced like other one-to-one intuitive sessions, from modest hourly rates for newer practitioners to several hundred dollars for established names, with appointments usually running sixty to ninety minutes. There is no licensing body, no exam, and no protected title, so price signals demand and marketing rather than verified skill. Certification courses cost far more than single readings and are the main revenue stream for many well-known teachers. Before booking, ask what the practitioner does when a question falls outside what they say the records address, and whether they record the session.
Are the Akashic records mentioned in Hindu or Buddhist scripture?
The Akashic records as a named archive do not appear in Hindu or Buddhist scripture. The Sanskrit word akasha does, meaning ether or space, and it functions in Vedic and Samkhya cosmology as the first and subtlest of the five great elements. The compound idea of a searchable record of all events was assembled by Theosophical writers in the late 1800s who took the Sanskrit term and attached it to a Western occult notion of an imprintable medium. Buddhist Yogacara philosophy offers a genuine parallel in alaya-vijnana, the storehouse consciousness holding the seeds of past action, but that is a technical term inside a philosophy of mind rather than an archive anyone visits.
Can the Akashic records tell you about your future?
In most Akashic records teaching the records show potentials rather than fixed outcomes, and readers are trained to describe trajectories instead of dates. The stated reason is that the record is a living document updated by choice, so a future read today reflects the direction someone is currently traveling rather than a settled destination. In practice this makes a prediction-heavy reading a warning sign about the practitioner rather than a feature. A reader who names a month for a marriage or a specific job offer has left the framework their own tradition describes.
Is it dangerous to open the Akashic records?
Akashic records practice carries no physical risk, and the ordinary version of it, sitting quietly, reading a prayer, and writing down impressions, is about as hazardous as journaling. The real risks are psychological and financial. Someone in acute grief or in the aftermath of trauma can find that hours of unstructured inner work destabilizes them further, and dissociation-prone people often find trance-style states unpleasant. The financial risk is being sold escalating packages by a practitioner who says your situation requires more sessions. There is also the risk of substituting a reading for medical or psychiatric help a situation actually needs.
What is the difference between the Akashic records and the Book of Life?
The Book of Life is a scriptural image from Jewish and Christian text, a ledger of names and deeds opened at judgment, while the Akashic records are an esoteric archive framed around reincarnation and soul learning rather than judgment. Edgar Cayce blurred the two deliberately, using Book of Life language for a Christian American audience while describing something structurally Theosophical underneath. The functional difference is purpose: scriptural books of life are read by God at a final accounting, while the Akashic records are described as consultable by the soul itself, during life.
How long does it take to learn to read the Akashic records?
Teachers of the Akashic records typically describe a first perceptible shift within a few weeks of daily practice and a workable personal practice within three to six months, though those figures come from course marketing rather than measured outcomes. The mechanical part, learning an opening prayer and a closing sequence, takes one sitting. What takes months is developing enough familiarity with your own inner voice to tell the difference between an impression that arrives and a sentence you constructed, a distinction most people find easier to make in retrospect through written notes.
Try Our Free Tools
Related topics: akashic records, how to access akashic records, akashic records reading, akashic record prayer, theosophy akashic, akashic records meaning, edgar cayce akashic records
