Abraham Hicks (Esther Hicks): Core Teachings, Key Ideas and Practices

Abraham Hicks explained without the sales pitch: who Esther Hicks is, the 22-step emotional guidance scale, the Vortex, deliberate creation, the books worth reading, a practice to try this week, and the documented criticism.

Who is Esther Hicks, and what does the name Abraham Hicks actually refer to?

Esther Hicks is an American speaker and author, born Esther Weaver on March 5, 1948, in Coalville, Utah, who says she translates the communication of a non-physical group consciousness she calls Abraham. The name Abraham Hicks is not one person. It is the combined label for Esther Hicks and the source she claims to speak for, and it is also the brand under which the books and workshops are sold. Esther Hicks met Jerry Hicks in 1976 and married him four years later. Jerry Hicks had worked as a performer earlier in life and had become a successful Amway distributor, and he had already been shaped by Napoleon Hill's Think and Grow Rich. The couple experimented with a Ouija board and read Jane Roberts's Seth material, and Esther Hicks says that in the mid-1980s she began receiving contact that first showed up as involuntary head movements spelling out letters. That developed into speech. Abraham-Hicks Publications, based in San Antonio, Texas, has published the resulting material for decades. Jerry Hicks died on November 18, 2011.

Esther Hicks describes the process in a way that sets it apart from older trance mediumship, and the distinction matters. She has consistently said she remains awake and aware, that she is not displaced by anything, and that what she receives arrives as blocks of knowing rather than dictated sentences, which she then renders into English. That framing makes Abraham Hicks less like a seance and more like simultaneous interpretation, and it explains why the delivery is conversational, humorous, and responsive rather than solemn. None of this establishes that the claimed source exists. It is an account of an experience, offered by the person having it, and it cannot be verified or falsified by anyone else. This article reports what Esther Hicks says about her own process rather than endorsing it, which is the only honest position available when the central claim is unobservable in principle.

Is Abraham Hicks a real person?

No. Abraham Hicks is not an individual. Esther Hicks is the real, living person who speaks, and Abraham is the name she gives to what she describes as a collective non-physical intelligence. The compound name became the standard way to refer to the teachings, the recordings, and the publishing operation, which is why search results and book covers use it as though it were a single author.

What was Jerry Hicks's role in the Abraham Hicks teachings?

Jerry Hicks was Esther Hicks's husband and the questioner behind much of the material. He supplied the commercial drive, having come from direct sales, and he pressed the questions that shaped the books, which carry both names. Jerry Hicks died in November 2011, and Esther Hicks continued the workshops afterward, though the interview structure he originally provided survives in the earlier recordings.

What are the core Abraham Hicks teachings?

The core Abraham Hicks teachings hold that everything operates by vibrational matching, that emotion is the instrument telling you what you are matching, and that the only work assigned to you is allowing. The material lays out creation in three steps. First, you ask, which the teaching says happens automatically as you live and bump into things you do not want. Second, the answer is given, said to be handled entirely by Source without your involvement. Third, you have to be in a position to receive it, and this step is what Abraham Hicks calls the Art of Allowing. The law of attraction in this framing is not a moral system and not a reward for effort. It is described as a neutral principle by which like draws like at the level of vibration, so that what you consistently feel determines what your experience assembles around. Unwanted experience is given a specific job. Abraham Hicks calls it contrast and treats it as useful rather than shameful, because bumping into what you do not want clarifies what you do want.

Deliberate creation is the term Abraham Hicks uses for doing on purpose what the teaching says everyone does by default. The claim is that most people are matching their current circumstances simply by observing them, so their attention keeps reproducing the situation they are describing, and the fix is to choose a thought for its feel rather than for its accuracy. That is where Abraham Hicks teachings diverge sharply from ordinary problem solving. Accuracy is explicitly deprioritized. A person is advised to reach for the thought that gives relief even if a truer thought is available, on the reasoning that the relieving thought moves the vibration while the accurate one only reinforces it. Critics regard this as a recipe for self-deception and the teaching regards it as the whole method, and both are describing the same instruction. The material also insists that resistance, not insufficient effort, blocks results, so trying harder is framed as counterproductive.

What are the three steps of creation in Abraham Hicks teachings?

Abraham Hicks teachings describe creation as asking, receiving an answer, and allowing. The asking is said to be automatic and largely unconscious, produced by daily friction. The answering is said to be Source's job and already complete. The allowing is the only human task, and consists of getting your own feeling state into a position where the answer can land. Almost every Abraham Hicks process targets this third step.

What does vibration mean in Abraham Hicks teachings?

In Abraham Hicks teachings, vibration means the felt tone of your habitual attention rather than anything measurable in physics. The material treats a mood, a belief you keep rehearsing, and an expectation as different names for the same underlying signal. Because vibration is defined by how something feels rather than by an instrument reading, the term is unfalsifiable, which is a standing objection to the framework.

What is the emotional guidance scale in Abraham Hicks teachings?

The emotional guidance scale is a 22-step ladder of emotions published by Esther Hicks and Jerry Hicks in Ask and It Is Given, arranged from the states the material calls least resistant down to the most resistant. It runs: 1 joy, knowledge, empowerment, freedom, love, appreciation; 2 passion; 3 enthusiasm, eagerness, happiness; 4 positive expectation, belief; 5 optimism; 6 hopefulness; 7 contentment; 8 boredom; 9 pessimism; 10 frustration, irritation, impatience; 11 overwhelment; 12 disappointment; 13 doubt; 14 worry; 15 blame; 16 discouragement; 17 anger; 18 revenge; 19 hatred and rage; 20 jealousy; 21 insecurity, guilt, unworthiness; 22 fear, grief, depression, despair, powerlessness. Abraham Hicks presents emotion as a gauge rather than a problem. The claim is that a feeling measures the distance between the thought you currently hold and the view your broader self holds of the same subject, so despair signals a wide gap and appreciation almost none. The scale is deliberately ordinal: it tells you which direction to move, not how well you are doing.

The instruction attached to the emotional guidance scale is the part most summaries get wrong. Abraham Hicks does not tell a person at step 22 to reach for step 1. The teaching is that the jump is too far to be believable, that an unbelievable thought produces no relief, and that no relief means no movement. The target is the next rung, or two at most. Applied honestly, this produces conclusions that sound wrong at first hearing. Anger at 17 is treated as an improvement on powerlessness at 22, because each step upward restores a fraction of agency, though the material is careful that this is a transit lounge and not a destination. The practical test the scale offers is relief rather than positivity. A thought that makes you feel physically looser counts as a step up regardless of how modest it sounds; one that makes you feel like you are performing has not moved you.

Is anger really higher than depression on the Abraham Hicks emotional guidance scale?

Yes. On the Abraham Hicks emotional guidance scale, anger sits at 17 and depression sits in the cluster at 22, so anger is treated as an improvement. The reasoning offered is that despair carries no sense of agency while anger carries some. Abraham Hicks frames anger as a rung to pass through on the way up rather than a place to settle, since the same logic makes staying angry a new limitation.

Does the emotional guidance scale mean you should never feel bad?

No. The emotional guidance scale assumes people will occupy its lower steps, and Abraham Hicks treats a bad feeling as information about the gap between a current thought and a broader perspective. What the teaching discourages is settling into a low step and calling it realism. The scale is a direction finder, so its use is to locate where you are and reach for the next rung.

How do you find your position on the emotional guidance scale?

You find your position on the emotional guidance scale by naming the subject first and the feeling second, because the same person sits at different steps for money, health, and family on the same afternoon. Abraham Hicks treats the scale as subject-specific rather than as a general mood reading. Writing the subject at the top of a page and the plainest name for the feeling underneath is enough to locate the rung.

What is the Vortex in Abraham Hicks teachings?

The Vortex in Abraham Hicks teachings is the image used for a holding place where every desire a person has ever launched is said to already exist in completed form. The material describes what it calls your Inner Being as standing inside that Vortex, already in possession of everything you have asked for, so the gap is never between you and the desire but between your current mood and the mood of the version of you that already has it. Getting into the Vortex therefore means matching a frequency rather than acquiring anything. Feeling appreciation, eagerness, relief, or ease is treated as evidence that the match has happened, and feeling resistance as evidence that it has not. Esther Hicks and Jerry Hicks devoted a 2009 book to the idea, The Vortex: Where the Law of Attraction Assembles All Cooperative Relationships, which applies it to relationships and argues that discomfort in a relationship comes from what you are focused on rather than from the other person's behavior. They later produced guided meditations built on the same image.

The practical function of the Vortex idea is that it changes what a person aims at. Under an ordinary goal framework you chase an outcome and check progress against it, which means you spend most of your time observing the absence of the thing. Under the Abraham Hicks version you aim at a feeling you can produce today, and the outcome is treated as a byproduct the material says is already handled. That reframing does relieve a specific kind of pressure, because it removes the daily verdict of failure that comes from measuring yourself against something you have not reached. It also has an obvious weakness. Because the Vortex is defined by feeling and its contents are said to be assembled invisibly, no result can ever count against it. Someone who feels good and gets what they wanted confirms the model, and someone who feels good and gets nothing is told the alignment was incomplete. The concept is unfalsifiable by construction.

How do you get into the Vortex according to Abraham Hicks?

According to Abraham Hicks, you get into the Vortex by reaching for any thought that produces genuine relief and then staying with it long enough for the feeling to stabilize, which the material says is a matter of seconds rather than hours. Appreciation of something already present is the most commonly recommended entry point, because it requires no belief about the future and therefore meets no internal argument.

What is the difference between the Vortex and the law of attraction in Abraham Hicks teachings?

In Abraham Hicks teachings the law of attraction is the claimed mechanism and the Vortex is the claimed storehouse. The law of attraction describes like drawing like at the level of vibration. The Vortex describes where desires are held while a person's vibration catches up to them. The Vortex language entered the Abraham Hicks material later and became the dominant metaphor in the workshops after 2009.

Which Abraham Hicks books and recordings should you start with?

Start with Ask and It Is Given, published in 2004 by Hay House, because it is the most structured book in the Abraham Hicks catalog and contains both the emotional guidance scale and a set of 22 processes for moving up it. Those processes carry names that recur throughout the rest of the material: the Rampage of Appreciation, Pivoting, Segment Intending, the Focus Wheel, Scripting, the Magical Creation Box, the Prosperity Game, and the Place Mat Process. From there, The Law of Attraction: The Basics of the Teachings of Abraham gives the compressed version of the philosophy, Money and the Law of Attraction from 2008 applies it to finances and physical wellbeing, and The Vortex from 2009 covers relationships. Esther Hicks and Jerry Hicks also wrote the Sara novels for younger readers. Alongside the books sits a very large body of workshop audio and video, which is where most people actually encounter Abraham Hicks teachings.

The format of the recordings is worth knowing before you start, because it explains both the appeal and the frustration people report. Abraham Hicks workshops run as unscripted question and answer sessions, with audience members taking a chair at the front and putting a personal problem to Esther Hicks. Answers are long, tangential, often funny, and highly repetitive across sessions, since the same principles are restated for each new questioner. Nothing is cited and no studies are referenced, because the material presents itself as coming from a non-physical source rather than from research. Readers who want propositions they can check will find this exhausting. Readers who respond to tone will find the repetition is the point, since the claim is that vibration shifts through soak time rather than through comprehension. A reasonable approach for a skeptical reader is to take Ask and It Is Given for the mechanics, sample a few hours of workshop audio, and skip the rest of the catalog, which restates the same framework.

What is the best Abraham Hicks book to start with?

Ask and It Is Given is the standard starting point for Abraham Hicks teachings because it is instructional rather than discursive. It sets out the emotional guidance scale and the 22 processes in a form you can work through, whereas most other titles are edited workshop transcripts that assume you already know the vocabulary. Readers mainly interested in money or relationships can go straight to Money and the Law of Attraction or The Vortex.

What happens at an Abraham Hicks workshop?

At an Abraham Hicks workshop, Esther Hicks sits on stage, briefly closes her eyes, and then speaks as Abraham while audience members come to a chair at the front to ask questions about their own lives. Sessions run for hours, answers are unscripted, and the exchanges are recorded and later sold. Abraham-Hicks Publications has run these events in US cities and on cruises, with paid admission.

What Abraham Hicks practice can you actually try this week?

Try a seven-day version of the emotional guidance scale ladder, the most testable practice in the Abraham Hicks material, at about ten minutes a day. On day one, pick one subject that is genuinely bothering you and write it at the top of a page. Underneath, write the plainest name for how you feel about it and find that word on the 22-step scale. Do not skip to a nicer word. Then write three sentences about the subject that sit one or two rungs higher and that you can actually believe. If you are at powerlessness, aim for irritation, not optimism. The test is physical: a genuine step up produces a small loosening in the chest or jaw, and a sentence you are performing produces nothing. On days two through six, repeat with the same subject, starting from wherever you actually are that morning. On day seven, read the page back. What you are checking is not whether the situation changed but whether your default starting rung moved, because that is the only claim this practice can honestly be tested against in a week.

Two additions make the week more useful. First, run a short Rampage of Appreciation on any morning when the ladder feels stuck: spend two minutes listing things you appreciate that are already true and physically present, starting with the trivially small, until the listing generates its own momentum rather than requiring effort. Abraham Hicks recommends appreciation of what already exists precisely because it meets no internal argument, unlike a statement about the future. Second, use Segment Intending at transition points. Before a meeting, a commute, or a difficult conversation, take fifteen seconds to state how you intend that specific segment to feel. Abraham Hicks treats the day as a series of segments rather than one block, and holds that a brief intention set at a boundary carries more weight than a general resolution set at dawn. The common failure in all of this is reaching too high. An affirmation pitched far above your current rung tends to produce an internal rebuttal, which the material would call increased resistance.

What is a Rampage of Appreciation in Abraham Hicks teachings?

A Rampage of Appreciation is an Abraham Hicks process from Ask and It Is Given in which you list things you appreciate, out loud or on paper, until the listing builds its own momentum and stops feeling effortful. The instruction is to start with things already present and undeniable rather than with hoped-for outcomes, because a statement about the present provokes no internal counterargument and so produces relief faster.

What is Segment Intending in Abraham Hicks teachings?

Segment Intending is an Abraham Hicks process in which you divide the day into segments and set a brief intention at the start of each one, such as before entering a meeting or beginning a drive. Abraham Hicks teaches that a specific intention set at a segment boundary works better than a broad daily resolution, because it is set close to the situation it is meant to shape.

How long does Abraham Hicks say you should hold a thought?

Abraham Hicks material describes a threshold of roughly seventeen seconds of pure focus before a thought is said to gather momentum, with the effect described as compounding over further intervals up to about sixty-eight seconds. The multipliers quoted in that teaching are assertions from the material rather than measured findings, and are best read as a memorable rule of thumb.

Where did Abraham Hicks teachings come from, and how do they differ from Neville Goddard?

Abraham Hicks teachings sit inside the American New Thought lineage and were assembled from influences that Esther Hicks and Jerry Hicks have described openly. Jerry Hicks had absorbed Napoleon Hill's Think and Grow Rich and worked in direct sales, which supplied the practical and commercial cast of the material. The couple's engagement with Jane Roberts's Seth material supplied the channeling format and much of the metaphysical architecture, including a larger non-physical self and a reality shaped by belief. The difference from Neville Goddard is sharp. Neville Goddard located the entire operation in imagination, teaching that you assume the feeling of the wish fulfilled, hold that single assumption until it feels natural, and revise the day's events in imagination afterward, all in explicitly Biblical language with God identified as human imagination. Abraham Hicks makes emotion rather than imagination the working instrument, replaces the decisive act of assumption with continuous incremental management of how you feel, drops scripture entirely, and adds a cosmology of a non-physical collective. Neville Goddard asks for one convincing act. Abraham Hicks asks for a gradual climb.

Against the closer relative, Jane Roberts's Seth material, the differences are of register rather than structure. Both present a non-physical intelligence speaking through a woman to an interviewing partner, both hold that belief shapes experience, and both describe a larger self outside physical focus. Seth is denser, more philosophically ambitious, and less oriented toward outcomes, while Abraham Hicks is simpler, warmer, and organized around getting people what they want. Critics who know both bodies of work argue that Abraham Hicks reproduces the Seth framework in an easier and more commercial form. Against Rhonda Byrne's The Secret, the distinction is that The Secret compressed the law of attraction into a promise about acquisition, while Abraham Hicks spends most of its time on emotional process and discourages chasing outcomes. The emotional guidance scale has spread well beyond its source, and teachers in the wider self-help world, including Gabrielle Bernstein, have written about using it as a standalone tool.

How is Abraham Hicks different from Neville Goddard?

Abraham Hicks and Neville Goddard differ in instrument and in tempo. Neville Goddard taught a single decisive act of imagination, assuming the feeling of the wish fulfilled and revising memory, in Biblical language. Abraham Hicks teaches gradual emotional climbing measured against the emotional guidance scale, with no scripture and with a claimed non-physical source. Readers who respond to decisive imaginative acts usually prefer Neville Goddard; those who need a step ladder prefer Abraham Hicks.

What is the connection between Abraham Hicks and the Seth material?

The connection between Abraham Hicks and Jane Roberts's Seth material is documented and acknowledged: Esther Hicks and Jerry Hicks read the Seth books before the Abraham communication began. The formats are alike, with a woman speaking for a claimed non-physical intelligence and a partner asking the questions. Critics argue Abraham Hicks is a simplified restatement of Seth, an objection about originality rather than about honesty.

What criticism do Abraham Hicks and Esther Hicks face?

Abraham Hicks faces four substantial criticisms, and a reader is better served by seeing them stated than by having them omitted. The first is the channeling claim itself, which cannot be tested and which skeptics regard as Esther Hicks speaking in a performed persona. The second is scientific: the law of attraction as taught here has no empirical support, its central term vibration has no measurable definition, and writers on pseudoscience have classified the framework accordingly. The third is originality, since the Abraham Hicks structure closely resembles Jane Roberts's Seth material, which Esther Hicks and Jerry Hicks read beforehand, and behind that sits a century of New Thought. The fourth is the moral implication of the central claim. If nothing enters a person's experience without a vibrational invitation, then illness, poverty, and abuse become things the sufferer participated in attracting, and critics argue this amounts to victim blaming however gently it is delivered. Alongside these sits the commercial scale of the operation.

Two specific episodes are frequently raised. Jerry Hicks was diagnosed with cancer, disclosed that he was receiving chemotherapy, and died on November 18, 2011. Critics pointed to this as a hard case for a body of teaching that makes strong claims about wellbeing following from alignment, and noted that conventional medical treatment was used. Supporters answer that Abraham Hicks has always described physical death as a transition rather than a failure, and that the teaching never promised exemption from it. Both positions are on the record. Separately, Esther Hicks was removed from later versions of The Secret in 2007 after a disagreement over contract terms covering distribution, and the Hickses chose not to sue. That episode is a commercial dispute, not misconduct, and it is often misreported as something more. What can be said flatly is that Abraham Hicks teachings make claims about health and money that no reader should act on in place of medical or financial advice, and that the framework is built so no outcome can disconfirm it.

How do critics use Jerry Hicks's death against Abraham Hicks teachings?

Jerry Hicks died of cancer on November 18, 2011, having disclosed months earlier that he was hospitalized and receiving chemotherapy. Critics of Abraham Hicks argue that this sits awkwardly with teachings presenting physical wellbeing as a result of vibrational alignment, and that the use of conventional treatment undercut the message. Defenders reply that Abraham Hicks has consistently described death as a transition, not a failure of alignment.

Is the law of attraction as taught by Abraham Hicks scientifically supported?

No. The law of attraction as taught by Abraham Hicks has no empirical support, and its key terms, particularly vibration and alignment, are defined by how something feels rather than by anything measurable. Commentators writing on pseudoscience have classified the framework as such. Some component habits, such as attention management and gratitude practice, have been studied separately, but that research does not validate the metaphysical claims.

Do Abraham Hicks teachings blame people for their own suffering?

Abraham Hicks teachings hold that nothing enters a person's experience without a vibrational match, and critics argue this necessarily implies that people participate in attracting illness, poverty, and abuse. The material resists the word blame and frames contrast as useful rather than deserved, but the implication remains, and it is the most common reason readers with histories of trauma abandon the framework.

Who do Abraham Hicks teachings not suit, and what do they not do?

Abraham Hicks teachings do not suit anyone in clinical depression, acute grief, or trauma recovery, and they are not designed to. The emotional guidance scale places depression and despair at its lowest rung and offers a thought-based route upward, which is not what a depressive episode responds to, and a person told that their mood is generating their circumstances can end up with guilt stacked on top of illness. The framework also does not suit people in genuine material emergency, where the correct move is practical and immediate. It does not suit anyone who needs external accountability, since the material consistently redirects questions about action toward questions about feeling. It does not suit readers who want claims they can check, because nothing in it is cited and nothing in it is falsifiable. What Abraham Hicks teachings do offer is a granular vocabulary for emotional states, a habit of noticing where you are before trying to move, and permission to aim for small relief instead of forced positivity, which is a real corrective to the harsher strands of positive thinking.

The most defensible way to use this material is partially. Take the emotional guidance scale as a mood-tracking instrument and the one-rung rule as a practical constraint on how much emotional change to attempt at once, and leave the cosmology alone. Used that way, the scale functions like a self-monitoring log: name the subject, name the state, aim for the adjacent state, note what actually produced relief. Nothing about that requires believing in a non-physical collective, and it sits alongside therapy, medication, and ordinary problem solving rather than replacing any of them. The point where the framework becomes actively risky is health. Abraham Hicks material makes assertions about physical wellbeing following from alignment, and a reader with a diagnosis who treats that as guidance is taking a real risk the material does not acknowledge. Read the emotional content, use the practice if it helps, and take medical and financial decisions on medical and financial grounds. Esther Hicks is a speaker and author, not a clinician.

Can Abraham Hicks teachings replace therapy?

No. Abraham Hicks teachings are not therapy and Esther Hicks is not a clinician. The emotional guidance scale can work alongside treatment as a self-monitoring habit, but depression, anxiety disorders, and trauma need clinical care, and a framework that attributes circumstances to a person's own vibration can add guilt for someone already struggling. Anyone unwell should treat Abraham Hicks material as optional reading, not as a treatment plan.

What do Abraham Hicks teachings not do?

Abraham Hicks teachings do not provide evidence, accountability, or a plan of action. The material is unfalsifiable by construction, it redirects action questions toward feeling questions, and it offers no way to tell a genuine result from a coincidence. Readers who want measurable outcomes will find nothing here to measure, which is a structural feature of Abraham Hicks teachings rather than an oversight in any one book.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who or what is Abraham in Abraham Hicks?

Abraham, in the Abraham Hicks material, is the name Esther Hicks gives to what she describes as a non-physical group consciousness rather than a single entity, which is why the material speaks in the plural. Esther Hicks says she does not go into a trance or lose awareness, and describes her role as translating a wordless stream into English. The claim cannot be tested from outside, and skeptics treat Abraham as Esther Hicks speaking in a performed voice.

What are the 22 emotions on the Abraham Hicks emotional guidance scale?

The emotional guidance scale published by Abraham Hicks runs: 1 joy, knowledge, empowerment, freedom, love, appreciation; 2 passion; 3 enthusiasm, eagerness, happiness; 4 positive expectation, belief; 5 optimism; 6 hopefulness; 7 contentment; 8 boredom; 9 pessimism; 10 frustration, irritation, impatience; 11 overwhelment; 12 disappointment; 13 doubt; 14 worry; 15 blame; 16 discouragement; 17 anger; 18 revenge; 19 hatred, rage; 20 jealousy; 21 insecurity, guilt, unworthiness; 22 fear, grief, depression, despair, powerlessness. Wordings vary slightly between printings and reproductions.

Which Abraham Hicks book contains the emotional guidance scale?

The emotional guidance scale appears in Ask and It Is Given, published by Esther Hicks and Jerry Hicks in 2004 through Hay House. That book also sets out 22 processes intended to move a person up the scale, including the Rampage of Appreciation, Pivoting, Segment Intending, the Focus Wheel, and Scripting. It is the usual starting point for readers new to Abraham Hicks teachings, because it is more instructional than the workshop transcripts that make up much of the rest of the catalog.

What does the Vortex mean in Abraham Hicks teachings?

The Vortex, in Abraham Hicks teachings, is a metaphor for a holding place where every desire a person has ever launched is said to already exist in finished form, with what the material calls the Inner Being standing inside it. Getting into the Vortex means matching that frequency by feeling relief, appreciation, or eagerness, and the material treats good feeling as evidence that the match has occurred. Esther Hicks and Jerry Hicks applied the idea to relationships in the 2009 book The Vortex.

Do you have to believe in channeling to use the emotional guidance scale?

No. The emotional guidance scale works as an ordinary mood ladder without accepting the Abraham Hicks claim about a non-physical source. Stripped of its metaphysics, the instruction is to name where you are emotionally, reach for a thought that produces genuine relief rather than one that sounds correct, and accept one small step rather than demanding cheerfulness. Many readers take the scale on those terms and leave the rest. What you lose is the cosmology that makes the scale feel meaningful to committed followers, not the practical mechanics.

Is Abraham Hicks connected to the film The Secret?

Yes. Esther Hicks appeared in the original 2006 release of The Secret and her contribution was substantial, but she was removed from later versions in 2007 after a disagreement with the production over contract terms covering distribution. Esther Hicks and Jerry Hicks did not pursue litigation and publicly framed that choice in terms of their own teachings about resistance. The episode is a commercial dispute rather than an allegation of misconduct, and it explains why viewers watching The Secret today may not see Esther Hicks in it.

Is Esther Hicks still teaching?

Esther Hicks has continued to lead workshops and publish through Abraham-Hicks Publications since the death of her husband and collaborator Jerry Hicks in November 2011. The organization has historically run live events in US cities and on cruises, alongside recordings, books, and a subscription library of workshop audio. Because schedules change, anyone planning to attend should check the official Abraham-Hicks site for current dates and prices rather than relying on secondhand listings.